Welcome to our website

Welcome in Your Blogger For Economy , Currency , Stocks and Bonds.

Saturday, December 25, 2010

Americans are leaving the bond mutual funds in its fastest pace in more than two years.

Americans are leaving the bond mutual funds in its fastest pace in more than two years.

U.S. investors withdrew 8.6 billion U.S. dollars of bond funds in the week ended Dec. 15, the biggest retreat since October 2008 when financial markets were in freefall. They took an average of nearly $ 3 million per week from November 23 under the Investment Company Institute. By November, the money has been flowing into bond funds every week for almost two years.

"This is the real deal," says Marilyn Cohen, founder of Envision Capital Management, which oversees $ 300 million in mostly fixed-income investments.

If she's right, the end of cheap credit is near. Interest rates would rise, which dominated the economy. It would be more expensive for cities, states and businesses to borrow money to build schools, roads and expand their businesses. It would also make the value of bond funds to fall back on the Americans who thought they had hidden their retirement savings into an investment that would not sink.

Bond funds are creditors. Take money from savers and lend it to businesses and governments in return for interest payments and promises that the money will be refunded on a particular date. If there is less money to lend, borrowers must pay higher rates to persuade the funds to buy its bonds.

It follows the law of supply and demand. If there is less of something, which pushes the price up. In this case, if the flow of money running into fixed income funds dried, cities, states and corporations that depend on them for financing will end up paying more to borrow.

That would hurt the cash-strapped states like California and Illinois, who can not afford higher debt payments. It also means that Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Johnson & Johnson and other corporations will no longer be able to borrow money at cheaper rates in history. IBM Corp. sold $ 1.5 billion of bonds in August at a rate of only 1 percent.

With few exceptions, Americans have favored U.S. stocks on the bonds since early 1990. The housing crisis broke that habit. The U.S. stock funds began to bleed cash in 2007 and bond funds began accumulating up.

That change was intensified during the financial crisis as people sought safer investments and bond funds began publishing becomes stronger. Banks and foreign governments issued U.S. bonds a favored hiding place during the financial crisis, knocking the yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury up nearly 2 percent. The performance has been above 5 percent in June and July 2007, before the onset of the Great Recession in December of that year.

The embrace of fixed income funds during the recession had many benefits, said Hans Mikkelsen, credit strategist at Bank of America-Merrill Lynch. The record of 376 billion that flowed into the bond market in 2009 allowed companies to refinance its debt at cheaper rates. Without it, says Mikkelsen, many companies have failed.

"It must have been the worst run of failures we've ever seen, but it ended up being the shortest," said Mikkelsen.

Like their safe and stable drew investors to the bond funds, the recent loss of market debt is scaring them away. In four of the last five weeks, Americans have pulled more money out of bond funds than they invested, the weeks that only this year that has happened.

Nicholas Colas, chief market strategist at BNY ConvergEx, check the data regularly to monitor investment flows for any surprise. Viewing slow and steady trickle of cash in them became tedious after a while.

"Now it's like when you see a car accident," he says. "First, look and think, 'Is this really happening? And then check to see if everything is okay."

Even the world's largest investment fund has lost some appeal. 256 billion U.S. dollars of Pimco Total Return Fund, managed by the bond market guru Bill Gross, again only 1 percent per month on average, to November, according to Morningstar. That month, the bond fund lost 1.4 percent, its worst performance since September 2008. Investors pulled $ 1,900,000,000 of the fund in November, the first net withdrawal of two years.

What motivated the change? It began with a sharp drop in bond prices in mid-November, which took interest rates in the long run, even the near-record minimum. That higher borrowing costs across the board sent, because all the U.S. debt markets inspired by the bond market.

Bond prices had been rising since late August in the hope that a major program to buy bonds of the Federal Reserve could keep interest rates increase the long term. But then a series of economic reports began to raise the hope that the economy was strengthening. That led to investors start pulling money out of Treasuries.

The big hit came after President Barack Obama announced a compromise with Senate Republicans to extend tax cuts for two years and unemployment benefits for one year. The economists raised their forecasts for economic growth and bond traders began preparing for further federal budget deficit. Both spell trouble for bonds. The tax package passed last Friday, is expected to cost $ 858 000 000 000.

"All that talk about Washington's desire to maintain tight budgets just got out of the window," said Colas.

The real danger, analysts say, is whether the sale begins to feed on itself, creating a sharp jump in interest rates over time. Investors ditch bonds, pushing down prices and cause more investors to flee. "Generate more sales selling," says Cohen. "The psychology of greed and fear will never change."

Under the worst case, long-term rates shoot higher and derail the recovery. If they rise slowly, without stifling economic growth, some think the money out of bond funds will find its way into equities. That has not happened yet. The U.S. stock funds are seeing an average of $ 2.3 billion in net withdrawals a week.

Stock funds have two important trends are running in your favor.

- The right actions became less volatile after the bond market began to weaken in November, and the major indexes have been on a steady rise. Analysts say investors resealable populations of many of the same reasons that were piled in the bond: a sense of security and greed.

- Studies show tend to follow the winners. This "chase returns" benefited bond funds when they beat people, and can help lift stocks next year, says Mikkelsen. 500 of Standard & Poor's has returned 15 percent including dividends over the past year and has targeted two-year highs day after day of this month. On Tuesday, he was at the level they traded at just before Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy in September 2008.

the economy is finally mounting a real recovery has strengthened this week

A growing sense that the economy is finally mounting a real recovery has strengthened this week the government released several pieces of building data. But progress still seemed modest and fragile, suggesting that even palpable improvement in the fortunes of the nation can not produce a vigorous economic expansion in the short term.

While millions of people are struggling to find work, and how many are losing their control over their homes - the addition of an excess supply causes anxiety even foreclosed real estate - many experts expect a significant period of pain may still be ahead .

Consumer spending, which comprises about 70 percent of the country's activity, increased in November - the most encouraging sign of all - and new and existing homes changed hands faster than in the previous month, although the levels is reduced to one year earlier.

But economists emphasized that significant pressures continue to weigh on U.S. consumers, which raises questions about the strength and sustainability of any recovery on the heels of the Great Recession. ordinary consumers are still absorbing the reality of household finances weakness, loss of wealth, large credit card debts, and gnawing worries about the labor market.

Until the economy can again be fueled by spending on the basis of solid paychecks and sustainable - a moment still far in average unemployment of 9.8 percent - the growth is unlikely to be powerful enough to be self-perpetuating, said economists. Ordinary people must do to improve your finances, as consumer demand and hiring companies to begin to reinforce each other.

"It's a mixed bag," said Chris Christopher, senior economist at Global Insight. "Some things look good, and certain things, well, wait and see."

Even things that are looking for are far better looking great.

Last month, consumer spending increased slightly, and home sales accelerated pace, according to data released on Wednesday and Thursday.

As the holiday season, consumers increased their spending by a relatively fast 0.4 percent in November from October, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Meanwhile, revenue rose 0.3 percent in November.

But economists emphasized that these improvements were relatively modest. Expenditure and income growth were lower in November than in October. She looked much better, however, that a bleak September, when revenues do not grow at all.

home sales were also poor, even as you improve. Sales of existing homes rose by 5.6 percent in November, while sales of new homes rose 5.5 percent in the month, according to the new versions of, respectively, the National Association of Realtors and The U.S. Commerce Department. But when the criterion is the same month last year, November home sales fell 27.9 percent last year, and sales of new homes fell by 21.2 percent.

Property prices, meanwhile, continue to fall, so homeowners most vulnerable to the values and foreclosure, and banks continue to leave doubts about the extent of losses that may still have to absorb. That tends to make banks more conservative, they cling to their dollars in comparison to the loans out. tighter credit bank puts the clamps for businesses that otherwise could expand and hire.

In fact, economists this week tried to put together a coherent picture of a flood of contrasting points of data, many concluded that modest improvements were unlikely to prove sufficient to lead to robust consumer spending.

With the labor market remains weak and housing continues as a drain on the wealth of many Americans, consumers seemed unlikely to spend the dollars needed to promote a strong recovery.

Once the holiday season is over - and with it the impulse to purchase regular season - consumer spending is expected to decline before it grows again.

"That growth rate will not stay," said Anika Khan, an economist at Wells Fargo. "Consumers are still fixing their balance sheets."

After many went beyond their means in the years before the financial crisis, Americans are struggling to pay their debts. This process is not easy. During the third quarter, the bank canceled 16.8 billion U.S. dollars of debt, acceptance of loan losses not paid, according to a recent study. In net terms, consumers increased their debt during that period by $ 6.5 billion.

However, even if consumers remain generally cautious - and for good reason - the data published by the hope of Wednesday and Thursday amplified broader economic improvement. Gross Domestic Product, which measures the total output of the U.S. economy grew 2.6 percent in the third quarter, according to BEA.

Other factors promoting growth. If consumers are not driving, which are at least riding.

"The consumer is able to keep pace with the overall economy," said Robert Dye, senior economist at PNC Financial Services Group. "They are not advancing the economy, but are at the same pace."

Consumers face multiple problems. Although revenue rose last month, 9.8 percent of the workforce remains unemployed. The company, apparently waiting to pick up demand before resuming its expansion, are usually sitting on cash instead of using it to hire workers: In relation to current liabilities, companies are now flush with more than who have been in more than 50 years.

In fact, companies are well placed. Since last year, corporate profits have grown a massive 26.4 percent, the BEA data show.

But this advantage for leaders is not all bad for your aspiring employees. Even if companies are hoarding cash directly harm consumers, corporate profits are indirectly helping. Moreover, the business situation rose appears to be a major cause of the increase in consumer spending.

portfolios are relatively strong. While home prices fell in the third quarter, and homeowners saw the game you can claim in your most valuable asset to erode by 2 percentage points, the net worth of households increased by 2.2 percent recent data from the Federal Reserve. As the S & P 500 rose 9.6 percent during the third quarter, the gain in household wealth came almost entirely from the stock market.

portfolios of U.S. securities have been relatively optimistic, even as home values slide, said Christopher, economist at IHS Global Insight. Consumer confidence rose this month to reach its highest level since June, according to a statement Thursday from Reuters and the University of Michigan.

If house price declines seem obscure to some consumers, the gains of the stock market are relatively easy to perceive.

"You know almost every day what your money market shares are," said Christopher. "With housing, you do not know exactly how to respond to it."

In addition, earnings from operations are helping to compensate for loss of income and value of the house, said Bernard Baumohl, chief economist of the Group of Economic Outlook.

"Americans are in a much better position to spend again," Baumohl said, adding that as consumers take on more debt, they are doing it responsibly, according to their income.

"Households are certainly a lesson," he said.

Other economists cautioned that a strong recovery is still far away. Christopher said the unemployment crisis a "drag extreme." Kahn said the housing market is "dead in the water." Aaron Smith, an economist at Moody's Analytics, said the recovery has yet to achieve "escape velocity".

the story of a lame duck Congress that it was not

This is the story of a lame duck Congress that it was not.

Shaken by a historic election in which voters angry cancels the House Democratic control, lawmakers from both parties and President Barack Obama tried something new: They consulted each other. They cooperated. And finally, they pledged.

From tax cuts for a nuclear arms treaty and repeal the ban on openly serving gay troops, Congress and Obama White House closed its respective shops and headed out for the holidays with a little bag Common full of achievements.

The bipartisanship was one of them.

"This progress is ... a reflection of the message voters sent in November, a message that says it's time to find common ground on the challenges facing our country," Obama told reporters before joining his family in Hawaii. "It's a message that I take seriously in the new year, and I hope my Democrat and Republican friends do the same."

That's less likely that come January, when Republicans took control of the House, gain seats in the Senate and is guided in part by an astute leader of the Republican Party has declared that his priority is to deny the president a second term 2012.

But even he - Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky - have taken away a place for the first time at the negotiating table with the Obama administration. Technically, he negotiated with Vice President Joe Biden, friend of McConnell in the Senate for years, in a huge package of tax cuts, plus the extension of benefits for millions of unemployed workers.

Both parties hoped that the commitment would earn points for pragmatism with centrist and independent voters will be key in the 2012 elections.

In truth, the voters struggling a gift of 858 billion U.S. dollars of Christmas was a politician without complications. But the commitment to an agreement and produced a visual that would have been unimaginable just a few weeks earlier.

Joe Miller plans to decide Monday whether to continue its legal challenge or a step back

Joe Miller Republican plans to decide Monday whether to continue its legal challenge to U.S. Alaska Senate race or a step back and let his Republican rival, Sen. Lisa Murkowski, will take over.

This follows the decision by the state Supreme Court on Wednesday to defend the election results for Murkowski.

Miller said Anchorage KTVA-TV on Wednesday it expected to decide the next day if you keep fighting. However, with the weekend approaching, he told Fox News on Thursday that he had consulted with supporters and his legal team and announce a decision Monday.

Monday is the deadline facing any case to federal court.

Miller said that all options being weighed. These include constitutional claims which the federal courts and granted. He has not said publicly if you lean a certain way.

"Obviously we are rational," said Miller KTVA. "We will make a decision based on whether we think we can continue to do good."

Miller has advocated a strict interpretation of the law calling to write on the ballot for the oval of the completed ballot and whether the candidate's name or the name as it appears in the written declaration of candidacy. The State, based on jurisprudence, which is used discretion in determining voter intent, which the ballots with misspellings that have to count Murkowski.

The high court called the voter's intent "paramount."

Unofficial results showed Murkowski leading by 10,328 votes, or votes 2169, when ballots challenged by Miller observers are excluded. He ran a write in campaign after losing his primary to Miller.

Murkowski today reiterated his call to Miller to accept, saying that the only people who will benefit from an ongoing struggle are the lawyers.

Miller was not immediately available for an interview with The Associated Press on Thursday. A statement issued by his campaign Wednesday ended with "PS" asking for donations of $ 25, $ 50, $ 75 or $ 100 to help "ensure a fair vote count in Alaska."

The state plans to ask a federal judge to lift a stay and allow Murkowski is certified the winner.

Members are scheduled to be sworn in for the new term of Congress, January 5.

Sarah Palin: Obama administration needs to "harden" to Iran on the basis of information leaked diplomatic cable

Sarah Palin sought to establish his foreign policy credentials Tuesday with a new opinion piece arguing that the Obama administration needs to "harden" to Iran on the basis of information leaked diplomatic cable that she had reported earlier.

The former governor of Alaska in the U.S. write Today:

Iran continues to defy the international community in its efforts to acquire nuclear weapons. Arab leaders in the region rightly fear a nuclear armed Iran. We suspected this before, but now we know for sure because of leaked diplomatic cable. King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia "often urged the U.S. to attack Iran to end its nuclear weapons program," according to these communications. Jordanian officials said the Iranian nuclear program must be stopped by any means necessary. Officials from the UAE and Egypt, the country was evil, an "existential threat" and a sponsor of terrorism. If Iran does not stop at obtaining nuclear weapons, could spark a nuclear arms race in which these countries seek their own nuclear weapons to protect themselves.

The "leaked diplomatic cable" that Palin talks about, of course, offices dump published as part of Wikileaks' most recent document, a move considered "traitors", later wondering why the group's founder, Julian Assange, not continued with the same urgency to pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders. "

The overall goal of op-ed on Palin is that the potential danger of Iran - nuclear or not nuclear - it is enough to justify an escalation of the current economic sanctions the United Nations:

Much more can be done, such as the prohibition of insurance for shipments to Iran, a ban on all military sales to Iran, putting an end to all commercial loans, the prohibition of all financial transactions with Iranian banks, limiting Iran's access to international capital markets and banking, the closure of airspace and waters of Iran's national air and shipping lines, and, above all, an end to Iran's ability to import refined petroleum.

Palin made another foray into foreign policy during the summer, when he attacked his manifesto on Facebook. In that statement, which called for a sacred defense budget, a reaffirmation of ties with Israel without conditions, and the elimination of a timetable for the withdrawal of troops in Afghanistan.

The White House is preparing a major base push to pass the DREAM Act next year

WASHINGTON - The White House is preparing a major base push to pass the DREAM Act next year, the president said on Wednesday was one of his top priorities after the legislation failed in the recent lame-duck session. Recognizing the next Congress will be much more resistant to the President's agenda, the White House also supports changing the rules of the Senate, although not involved in specific proposals.

In a conference call with reporters Wednesday, the White House, Dan Pfeiffer, communications director said the President is willing to "undertake a very public campaign" to promote the DREAM Act, which would give undocumented students who were brought to United States as children by their parents a path to citizenship through higher education or military service. He said grassroots activism, will be essential for success.

"The President always said during the campaign that change comes from the bottom up, and issues such as the DREAM Act, you have to, because there is real reluctance in Washington - especially on the other side, but some of us - - and I think we need to get people active, and I think you'll find a lot of that in the coming months and years, "Pfeiffer said in response to a question from The Huffington Post.

During a news conference Wednesday, Obama said he will contact the Republicans, who may believe "in his heart of hearts" that the passage of the DREAM Act is what to do, but I think the policy is difficult .

"Well, that may mean we have to change policy," Obama said. "And I have to spend some time talking to the American people, and others have to spend some time talking to the American people, because I think if the American people knew any of these children - you probably do, just can not know their status - it seems that, of course, want that is what we are That's the better angels of our nature "...

Pfeiffer said the White House also was frustrated by the slowness of the confirmation of judicial nominees and staff of the President. In the past, Obama has adopted to change the Senate rules, saying that "I will say that as an observer of our political process, which if not managed how to use the veto in the Senate, then it will be very difficult for us in the long term to compete in a fast-moving global environment. "

Pfeiffer, however, said the White House would not support any specific proposal, because it is an issue that the Senate has to work for herself. "I'm not sure that a president involved in a case such as the legislative power is considered constructive by the other branch," he said.

As The Huffington Post has reported, the principal senators filibuster reform effort have said bipartisan support is building around three proposals: 1) no longer allowing senators to block the movement to proceed and allow instead a fixed amount of time for discussion, 2) ending secrecy is maintained, and 3) to stop filibustering senators hide behind calls for a quorum and force them to talk if they block a bill. Senator Tom Harkin (D-Illinois) said he hoped that "fireworks", the January 5, 2011, the day that the Senate may, according to him, to reform its rules, by simple majority.

the White House could soon be looking to fill staff vacancies with candidates

Senior White House adviser Valerie Jarrett, said on Thursday that the White House could soon be looking to fill staff vacancies with candidates from outside the administration.

In an interview with MSNBC's "Morning Joe" Jarrett said people could expect to see some "new faces" to "outside voices" in the White House next year, possibly including the chief of staff position, now is temporarily in the hands of Peter Rouse, who replaced Rahm Emanuel, Emanuel left as mayor of Chicago.

"I think it definitely is looking for some new faces. Larry Summers left, Rahm left, will probably be some new faces, " said Jarrett. "I think that, as in any administration, after a couple of years for a variety of reasons, people go by and there is an opportunity to bring new people in. And I think the president is interested in doing that."

A number of other high-profile departures have shaken the White House over the past two months, with the Budget Director Peter Orszag - now employed by Citigroup - and the head of the Council of Economic Advisers Christina Romer both resigned during the summer . Senior Obama adviser David Axelrod, also announced that the administration would be leaving sometime next year to return to Chicago. Former Obama campaign manager, David Plouffe, is expected to return next president to replace Axelrod.

"most successful tea Partier" & "Senator Junior DeMint"

With all the hoopla surrounding Sharron Angle and Christine Miller and Joe O'Donnell during the exams, it was easy to lose track of some conservative candidates equally, but less extravagant. And it seems safe to say that most successful tea Partier, while attracting national attention under Mike Lee. While running for the Senate, 39 years old, a Utah Republican to dismantle the Department of Education and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. He wants to repeal both the federal income tax and the provision of the Fourteenth Amendment that makes children born in the United States citizens automatically. However, he sailed to victory with a margin of near-30 point in a Senate race that was overlooked in large part by national media.

In the future, Lee is likely to attract a little more attention. In fact, it could be the Platonic ideal of the new Constitution-obsessed Republican Party, Tea Party, infusion: a lawyer who knows how to raise constitutional arguments to justify the extreme ideas and a surprisingly cordial, the rational disposition. If in the future, the movement of the Tea Party wants a national leader who does not scream nuts, Mike Lee, is likely to be the guy.



Among its strengths, Lee has inside knowledge of the contents of near garage, Harry Reid, 1982. In the 80's, when Reid and the Lees moved to Washington, Harry Reid, to serve as a representative of Nevada, and Rex Lee, Mike's father, to serve as Attorney General in the Reagan administration, the two families, although far away politically, made friends through the Mormon Church. Harry's son, Josh, relates that his father, a practical joker, once closed preteen Mike Lee in the garage until he cried uncle.

Lee spent most of his childhood hopscotching from Utah, where his father was the founding dean of Brigham Young University Law School and McLean, Virginia. He attended Brigham Young University law school and then just leaving Utah to attend a two-year mission in Texas in 1990. After graduating from law school in 1997, he worked for several judges, including the then Court of Appeals Justice Samuel Alito, and returned to Utah to serve as Assistant U.S. Attorney Salt Lake City. In 2005 he moved to the policy of the legal department of Governor Jon Huntsman, again before clerking for Alito on the Supreme Court. He then spent two years in private practice back in Utah.

In mid-2009 as a tea party protests escalated, Utah Senator Bob Bennett, who had voted in favor of bank bailouts and has shown some willingness to work with Democrats on a bill of health, fell Focus on the right. Lee began to speak in front of small crowds in schools and libraries in cities such as Provo and the Alps. Brandishing a pocket Constitution and suggesting the removal of several federal agencies, Lee could have found as another crackpot, but one key difference: He knew his case.

Lee made few concessions to non-specialist audience. He radically complex arguments and legal, convinced that people are noticing. "In a keynote speech a few, I found the basic story of Wickard v. Filburn for them ... and people do. They got it," Lee said earlier this year. Not only did he, were excited. Lee understands constitutional law, and soon, given the mood-Constitution right mind, meant more than that.

Momentum behind it, but the GOP elders maintained their loyalty to Bennett. It was the extreme right in South Carolina Senator Jim DeMint and the Senate Conservatives Fund effectively anointed Lee. "DeMint let us know what was happening," says Russ Walker, FreedomWorks national political director at the time. Walker and others in FreedomWorks Lee underwent a stress test candidates to interview him and see how it handles compared to councils in Utah. Lee passed with flying colors.

DeMint enthusiasm resulted in about $ 200,000 in independent expenditures in the Senate Conservatives Fund during Lee's campaign. FreedomWorks, meanwhile, provided the ground game, organizing volunteer supporters to go door to door and the hiring of Texas and California to make phone calls. On the eve of the primary, a Lee victory stunned and turned to Brendan Steinhauser, director of federal and state campaigns FreedomWorks, and said: "I looked around and saw all the signs and all I could think of was that God FreedomWorks bless you and God bless America. "After having sailed through the general election, Lee now looks likely to become a loyal foot soldier of the small but growing faction DeMint in the Senate. "Around here," Utah Representative Jason Chaffetz said, "people are already calling the Junior Senator DeMint."



But more than anything else, Lee's legal expert who has excited conservatives. Leonard Leo, executive vice president of the Federalist Society, he predicts, "It will be one of the most ardent and articulate defenders of limited constitutional government in the Senate." And the fluidity Lee on legal issues is undeniable attraction. To listen to a speech to the Federalist Society in November, in which he talked about a number of constitutional issues to a room full of conservative lawyers worship, even I was carried away by his rhetoric, nodding his head as the names listed cases. He was affable and funny, making fun of the president without rash boiling rage that comes to mind when most think of the liberal movement Tea Party. Only when I came to a conclusion a step back and realize that just raised the unconstitutionality of the bill the Democrats back health care, and a number of federal agencies to initiate, through a clever and discussion convincing the Commerce Clause. It seemed, at least at the time, reasonable enough to me.

Of course, Lee can not always hide their extremism in eloquence. But even more dramatic proposals have failed to attract the kind of anger directed toward right-wing candidates whose views were ultimately part of his downfall. In October, when Lee said that the Republican Congress should pass a law that does not strike the defense, non-discretionary federal spending by 40 percent, the camp was quick to walk again, the statements seem to realize the impossibility of such a proposal. "It was just a talking point," said his spokesman, Boyd Matheson. But it would be more cautious in the future? "No, not really, because Mike will be up," said Matheson. "He was sorry he was cast? No, because it created a lot of dialogue. Some people even began to make calculations on it."

Lee, it seems clear, has a disarming ability to suggest to the extreme in terms acceptable to pull the rope to places that might have seemed unthinkable a few years ago. And, as has one of the safest seats in the Senate at the tender age of 39, likely will have the opportunity to do this for long. Harry Reid could find himself wishing they could still block Mike Lee in a garage.